May 11, 2009 (c) 2009 MGI RESEARCH, LLC
May 11, 2009 (c) 2009 MGI RESEARCH, LLC
May 11, 2009 in Business Intelligence, Cloud Computing, Data Management, Database Market, Desktop Virtualization, eHealth, Enterprise 2.0, Enterprise Software, Enterprise Software Applications, ERP, Healthcare IT, Infrastructure, Ingres, IT Industry Trends, Jaspersoft, Long Ideas, M&A, MGI Scores, Middleware, mySQL, Networking Vendors, Open Source, Oracle, SaaS, SaaS On Demand, SAP, Short Ideas, Talend | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: Alfresco, AMR Research, analysis of Linux, analysis of open source software, analysis of Salesforce.com, CRM, Forrester research on SugarCRM, Gartner analysis of SugarCRM, Gartner research on RedHat, impact of open source on tech industry, industry analysis of open source, Ingres, Jaspersoft, John Roberts, Linux, market share analysis of Linux, MGI Research analysis of SugarCRM, mySQL, Novell, open source, open source market share, Oracle, Oracle vs SAP, ORCL, RedHat, SaaS, Salesforce.com, SAP, SAP vs Salesforce.com, Software-as-a-service, SugarCRM, Talend
April 28, 2009 (c) 2009 MGI RESEARCH, LLC
The recent SAP-Teradata announcement that SAP's BW (Business Warehouse) will be ported to Teradata (NYSE: TDC; MGI: NR) comes only one week after Oracle's public bid to acquire Sun Microsystems. The press release was light on details - e.g., shipment dates, channel issues, scant mention on either company's website, and in the short term was of greater benefit to Teradata, which extended its ability to re-sell the SAP/Business Objects BI products. Given the tactical nature of the announcement, and the practical reality that it will be at least 6-9 months before customer beta testing of the SAP/Teradata combo, MGI Research sees minimal short term benefit of the announcement to SAP, and minor impact to IBM or Oracle. In the bigger picture, the event highlights the tectonic shift that will occur if Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL; MGI-X:2,314) closes the Sun (Nasdaq: JAVA; MGI-X:656) transaction. We re-iterate our view that HPQ or IBM are likely bidders for SAP within the next 24-36 months.
Absent from the announcement was any reference to a deal around demand forecasting - a known weakness for SAP, particularly in retail and in spite of its Khimetrics acquisition, and a relative strength for Teradata. The lack of any news means the expected Teradata/SAS (private; MGI-X: NR) partnership may still go forward.
The deal underscores the emerging reality that Oracle will effectively distance itself from SAP, and now compete head to head with HP (NYSE: HPQ; MGI-X:1,822) and IBM (NYSE:IBM; MGI-X:1,769) if it finalizes the acquisition of Sun. HP's relationship with Oracle will cool, and the HP/Oracle Teradata-killer product ("HP/Oracle Database Machine") is likely relegated to the junk heap of joint development projects. Oracle's strong MGI scores through 30+ acquisitions large and small points to its ability to innovate through acquisitive growth combined with operational efficiency.
For a company that historically possessed tremendous strategic vision and world-class execution, SAP increasingly looks tactical and lacking a coherent strategy. SAP abandoned Cognos as the two companies were working joint go-to-market efforts when SAP launched its bid for Business Objects, pushing Cognos into the hands of IBM. Global 2000 CIOs are eager to reduce their supplier base, and without a broader product set or a clear edge in innovation, SAP is at risk of losing its seat at the table of industry leaders inside the enterprise.
MGI Research believes IBM is an innocent bystander in this announcement - neither benefiting significantly from it, nor feeling any pain from SAP/Teradata announcement-ware.
Bottomline: The SAP-Teradata announcement does little to alter the rapidly changing industry dynamics in which Oracle is emerging stronger than ever, with impressive MGI-X scores, and SAP is playing a reactionary game in which it is unclear if it can or will compete via acquisition or internal development. If Oracle is successful in integrating Sun (and it maintains ownership of the hardware assets), IBM and HP will be under pressure to make a run for SAP - a logical combination for both companies. Teradata may be a tuck-in acquisition for a larger player, or more likely, simply an industry orphan with a robust installed base and maintenance revenues.
April 28, 2009 in Business Intelligence, Cloud Computing, Data Management, Database Market, Enterprise 2.0, Enterprise Software, Enterprise Software Applications, ERP, Hardware, Infrastructure, Ingres, IT Industry Trends, Long Ideas, M&A, MGI Scores, mySQL, Oracle, Predictive Analytics, SaaS, SAP, Short Ideas, Tech Industry Giants | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: AMR Research analysis of SAP, analysis of IBM, analysis of SAP Teradata annoucement, Business Objects, Cognos, Cognos vs Business Objects, competitive analysis Oracle, database wars, future of IBM, Gartner analysis of SAP, Hewlett-Packard, HP Oracle Database Machine, HP vs IBM, HPQ, IBM, IBM retail, impact of SAP Teradata deal on Oracle, Industry analysis of Oracle, Industry analysis of Teradata, JAVA, MGI analysis of Oracle, MGI analysis of SAP, MGI Research, MGI scores, MGI-CV, MGI-X, Oracle, Oracle retail, Oracle vs SAP, ORCL, SAP, SAP buyers, SAP retail, SAP vs Oracle, SAS Institute, Sun, SWOT analysis of HP, SWOT analysis of SAP, TDC, Teradata, Teradata retail vertical, Teradata SWOT analysis, who will buy SAP
February 27th, 2009
(c) 2009 MGI RESEARCH, LLC
We attended a three day tech conference sponsored by
Pacific Crest Securities, a technology focused investment bank. Day 1 was dedicated to Data Center and Cloud
computing, Day 2 was focused on On-demand/SaaS software, and Day 3 targeted
Clean Tech. The event was well-organized, well-attended, and offered a bevy of
market and company insights. Unsurprisingly, the overall tone of conference
presentations was muted, downbeat and cautious. The following themes dominated:
Most companies expressed a great deal of uncertainty
about the timing of the current recession. There is no clear sense that the
economy will recover during the second half of 2009 and several CEOs have
expressed a great deal of anxiety over the length of the current recession.
Unclear Economic Drivers
No product or sector jumped out as a “must-have” product
or technology in 2009. IT buyers are
under no pressure to buy anything – or even pay their maintenance bills – in
2009.
Stimulus Money Out of the Picture
Largely absent in the prepared remarks and the Q&A of
nearly every presentation of Day 1 and Day 2 was mention of how the government
stimulus money would impact a given sector or company. Even on Day 3, clean tech companies provided
minimal information on the topic.
Demand Visibility is Zero
No surprise, nearly every CEO/CFO lamented the lack of
pipeline visibility. Of deals that
slipped out of Q4, 15-25% may be completely lost, with another 25-30% that may
or may not happen in the first half of 2009.
Software Maintenance Revenue Risks
There is now a more clear sense among market participants
that maintenance revenues and SaaS renewals are in play. Even companies with
considerable maintenance revenue streams (e.g., Symantec, MGI-X: 1,361 NASDAQ:
SYMC) lacked conviction in their presentations.
As MGI Research predicted earlier in 2008 (Software Maintenance Revenue
– Sacred Cow or Hamburger Meat?), maintenance revenues are now under pressure
thus highlighting the need for companies to optimize their execution and
business models for survival in 2009.
Current Economy Testing Management Teams
The current investor psychology bias is clearly in favor
of those management teams with defensive plans and that have the leverage to
adjust their business models and generate cash. In our view, companies with MGI
Index scores below 1,000 are going to be struggling and those with scores below
500 are at risk.
Lack of ROI Proof is Hurting Tech
Many CEOs mentioned the 9-16 month maximum timeline for
Return on Investment (ROI) that customers are now demanding. With a few
exceptions, most conference presenters did a below average job at articulating
their core value and ROI either through direct savings or through new revenue
generation. Despite a common refrain that “customers are taking longer to buy,
and demanding shorter pay-back periods, very few companies produced or even
mentioned a credible ROI or TCO model or a case study.
VDI is DOA, Long Live the Cloud
While VMWare core server-based products continue to win
market share, VMware’s efforts to bring virtualization to the desktop, via its
VDI (virtual desktop infrastructure) initiative appears to be falling short of
expectations in the marketplace. In
defense of VMW, Citrix was surprisingly
quiet about its Xen success at the desktop, and Desktone, a DaaS (desktop as a
service) company was equally unexciting.
Even though VMWare may not be winning at desktop virtualization but no
one else is either. It is not clear if the VDI market will reach maturity and
if it is worth dominating. At the same time, in many sessions and panels,
presenters sang praises to various forms of public and private cloud computing.
There seems to be a consensus emerging on some sort of a federated,
public/private cloud computing model and corresponding desktop and server tool
set needed to support access and security for this paradigm.
Deluge of M&A in 2H09?
A well-run panel on SaaS/On-demand sector M&A was
standing room only. Corporate
development representatives from Microsoft, Netsuite and Concur sat on a panel,
along with Ed Booth, the former CEO of IDeaS (acquired by SAS). Tellingly, two-thirds of the people in the
room were VCs, and one-third of the panel attendees were executives. The panelists agreed that private company
valuations have yet to re-set as deeply as public company valuations. A panelist from Microsoft has re-iterated his
company’s view that there should not be a premium to valuation of SaaS
companies even if one takes deferred revenues into account and correctly
pointed out that enterprise software companies have plenty of deferred revenue
items themselves. While it may be self-serving for Microsoft to state that, it
is also factual as many mature enterprise software firms boast ratios of
deferred to reported revenues that are similar to those from established SaaS
companies like Salesforce.com.
Conversations with various conference participants and attendees
furthers our view that in spite of challenges, the second half of 2009 and
early 2010 will see a deluge of M&A as many private companies seek the
shelter of larger, more profitable public and private companies or merge with
equals in the hopes of fusing a larger, more stable business platform.
Clean Tech - Dead Money for 2009
Day 3 of the conference was devoted to clean tech
companies, and over 30 companies presented, from Applied Materials to Xjet Solar. The recession is clearly having a major impact
on clean tech, as depressed energy prices are altering the economics of many
clean tech projects, frozen debt markets have locked up major infrastructure
projects (e.g., large scale solar and wind projects that require debt
financing), and green initiatives have been slammed into the back seat as
survival con-cerns top the corporate agenda.
Given the confluence of dynamics, most public clean tech companies
appear to be stuck in neutral, at best, and at risk if the recession worsens or
extends far into 2010.
March 02, 2009 in Cloud Computing, Desktop Virtualization, eHealth, Enterprise 2.0, Enterprise Software, Enterprise Software Applications, ERP, Hardware, Infrastructure, IT Industry Trends, Long Ideas, M&A, MGI Scores, Oracle, Predictive Analytics, SaaS, SaaS On Demand, SAP, Short Ideas, Tech Industry Giants, Virtual Desktop, Virtualization, Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: 2009 software trends, analysis of Citrix, analysis of on-demand, analysis of SaaS, analysis of VMware, Cisco, Citrix, clean tech, clean technology, competitive analysis of Websense, CSCO, CTXS, DaaS, death of VDI, Desktone, desktop as a service, future of maintenance, future of virtualization, IBM, impact of stimulus on IT, IT industry demand, MGI Research, MGI Research analysis of SaaS, Microsoft, on-demand software, Oracle, Pac Crest Securities, Pacific Crest, ROI, ROI analysis of SaaS, ROI of SaaS, ROI of software, SaaS, SaaS consolidation, SaaS M&A, Salesforce.com, SAP, software earnings outlook, software maintenance revenues, software maintenance trends, software pipeline visibility, software sector consolidation, Stimulus dollars and IT, Stimulus spending and tech, Symantec, SYMC, TCO models, tech earnings projections, tech industry outlook, VDI, virtualization, VMW, VMware, WBSN, web desktop, Websense